Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950 vs GeForce GTX 1070 SLI

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking149not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency9.46no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Gen. 3 (2005)
GPU code namePascal GP104 SLIGMA 950
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date16 August 2016 (10 years ago)1 March 2005 (21 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38404
Core clock speed1506 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1683 MHz250 MHz
Number of transistors14400 Millionno data
Manufacturing process technology16 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt7 Watt

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount2x 8 GBno data
Memory bus width256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed8000 MHzno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_1no data
Vulkan+-
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 16 August 2016 1 March 2005
Chip lithography 16 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 7 Watt

GTX 1070 SLI has an age advantage of 11 years, and a 713% more advanced lithography process.

Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950, on the other hand, has 4186% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 1070 SLI and Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1070 SLI is a desktop graphics card while Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950 is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 217 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1070 SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 83 votes

Rate Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1070 SLI or Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.