FirePro W9100 vs GeForce GTX 1070 SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1070 SLI with FirePro W9100, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1070 SLI
2016
2x 8 GB GDDR5, 300 Watt
37.09
+99.4%

1070 SLI outperforms W9100 by an impressive 99% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking144333
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency9.565.23
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code namePascal GP104 SLIHawaii
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date16 August 2016 (9 years ago)26 March 2014 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38402816
Core clock speed1506 MHz930 MHz
Boost clock speed1683 MHzno data
Number of transistors14400 Million6,200 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt750 Watt
Texture fill rateno data163.7
Floating-point processing powerno data5.238 TFLOPS
ROPsno data64
TMUsno data176
L1 Cacheno data704 KB
L2 Cacheno data1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data275 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Form factorno datafull height / full length
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2x 8 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit512 Bit
Memory clock speed8000 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data320 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x S-Video
G-SYNC support+-
StereoOutput3D-+
Dual-link DVI support-+
HD сomponent video output-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.3
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan+1.2.131
CUDA+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD118
+115%
55−60
−115%
4K56
+107%
27−30
−107%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 200−210
+107%
100−105
−107%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
+118%
40−45
−118%
Palworld 100−105
+100%
50−55
−100%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 100−105
+100%
50−55
−100%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 130−140
+100%
65−70
−100%
Counter-Strike 2 200−210
+107%
100−105
−107%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
+118%
40−45
−118%
Far Cry 5 120−130
+102%
60−65
−102%
Fortnite 280
+100%
140−150
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+107%
70−75
−107%
Palworld 100−105
+100%
50−55
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+111%
70−75
−111%
Valorant 220−230
+101%
110−120
−101%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 130−140
+100%
65−70
−100%
Counter-Strike 2 200−210
+107%
100−105
−107%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+114%
130−140
−114%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
+118%
40−45
−118%
Dota 2 140−150
+104%
70−75
−104%
Far Cry 5 120−130
+102%
60−65
−102%
Fortnite 176
+107%
85−90
−107%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+107%
70−75
−107%
Grand Theft Auto V 87
+118%
40−45
−118%
Metro Exodus 85−90
+123%
40−45
−123%
Palworld 100−105
+100%
50−55
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+111%
70−75
−111%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 111
+102%
55−60
−102%
Valorant 220−230
+101%
110−120
−101%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 130−140
+100%
65−70
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
+118%
40−45
−118%
Dota 2 140−150
+104%
70−75
−104%
Far Cry 5 120−130
+102%
60−65
−102%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+107%
70−75
−107%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+111%
70−75
−111%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 73
+109%
35−40
−109%
Valorant 220−230
+101%
110−120
−101%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 123
+105%
60−65
−105%
Palworld 100−105
+100%
50−55
−100%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 90−95
+109%
45−50
−109%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 260−270
+102%
130−140
−102%
Grand Theft Auto V 75−80
+120%
35−40
−120%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+100%
27−30
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+106%
85−90
−106%
Valorant 250−260
+111%
120−130
−111%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 95−100
+116%
45−50
−116%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+105%
21−24
−105%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+102%
45−50
−102%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+112%
50−55
−112%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70−75
+103%
35−40
−103%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 95−100
+120%
45−50
−120%
Palworld 55−60
+107%
27−30
−107%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+105%
21−24
−105%
Grand Theft Auto V 81
+103%
40−45
−103%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+113%
16−18
−113%
Palworld 30−35
+106%
16−18
−106%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 54
+100%
27−30
−100%
Valorant 220−230
+108%
110−120
−108%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 55−60
+119%
27−30
−119%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+105%
21−24
−105%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+100%
10−11
−100%
Dota 2 100−110
+116%
50−55
−116%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+104%
24−27
−104%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+100%
35−40
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+104%
24−27
−104%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 38
+111%
18−20
−111%
Palworld 30−35
+106%
16−18
−106%

This is how GTX 1070 SLI and FirePro W9100 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1070 SLI is 115% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1070 SLI is 107% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 37.09 18.60
Recency 16 August 2016 26 March 2014
Chip lithography 16 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 750 Watt

GTX 1070 SLI has a 99% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 75% more advanced lithography process, and 150% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1070 SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro W9100 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1070 SLI is a desktop graphics card while FirePro W9100 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 217 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1070 SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 19 votes

Rate FirePro W9100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1070 SLI or FirePro W9100, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.