Radeon PRO WX 2100 vs GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
1050 Mobile 1050 3 GB Max-Q 1050 Max-Q 1050 Mobile 3 GB 1050 Ti Mobile 1050 Ti Max-Q 1060 Mobile 1060 Max-Q 3 GB 1060 Max-Q 6 GB 1070 Mobile 1070 Max-Q 1070 SLI Mobile 1080 Mobile 1080 Max-Q 1080 SLI Mobile
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
P30PH Instinct MI6 Pro Duo Polaris Pro V5300X Pro V7300X Pro V7350X2 PRO WX 2100 PRO WX 3100 Pro WX 4100 Pro WX 5100 Pro WX 7100

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q with Radeon PRO WX 2100, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1070 Max-Q
2017
8 GB GDDR5, 115 Watt
16.68
+267%

1070 Max-Q outperforms PRO 2100 by a whopping 267% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GTX 1070 Max-Q GTX 1070 Max-Q
PRO WX 2100 PRO WX 2100

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking365712
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.04
Power efficiency11.2210.03
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameGP104Lexa
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date27 June 2017 (9 years ago)4 June 2017 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$149

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048512
Core clock speed1215 MHz925 MHz
Boost clock speed1379 MHz1219 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)115 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate176.539.01
Floating-point processing power5.648 TFLOPS1.248 TFLOPS
ROPs6416
TMUs12832
L1 Cache768 KB128 KB
L2 Cache2 MB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed2002 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth256.3 GB/s48 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync-+
VR Ready+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA6.1-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 1070 Max-Q 16.68
+267%
PRO WX 2100 4.54

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1070 Max-Q 6950
+268%
Samples: 863
PRO WX 2100 1891
Samples: 280

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD94
+292%
24−27
−292%
4K41
+310%
10−12
−310%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data6.21
4Kno data14.90

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 95−100
+375%
20−22
−375%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+300%
9−10
−300%
Palworld 40−45
+264%
10−12
−264%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 35−40
+429%
7−8
−429%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 81
+350%
18−20
−350%
Counter-Strike 2 95−100
+375%
20−22
−375%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+300%
9−10
−300%
Far Cry 5 81
+479%
14−16
−479%
Fortnite 90−95
+241%
27−30
−241%
Forza Horizon 4 101
+381%
21−24
−381%
Palworld 40−45
+264%
10−12
−264%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 94
+422%
18−20
−422%
Valorant 130−140
+129%
55−60
−129%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 81
+350%
18−20
−350%
Counter-Strike 2 95−100
+375%
20−22
−375%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 210−220
+169%
80−85
−169%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+300%
9−10
−300%
Dota 2 112
+180%
40−45
−180%
Far Cry 5 78
+457%
14−16
−457%
Fortnite 122
+352%
27−30
−352%
Forza Horizon 4 97
+362%
21−24
−362%
Grand Theft Auto V 105
+600%
14−16
−600%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+350%
8−9
−350%
Palworld 40−45
+264%
10−12
−264%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 116
+544%
18−20
−544%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 95
+631%
12−14
−631%
Valorant 130−140
+129%
55−60
−129%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 75
+317%
18−20
−317%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+300%
9−10
−300%
Dota 2 110
+175%
40−45
−175%
Far Cry 5 75
+436%
14−16
−436%
Forza Horizon 4 79
+276%
21−24
−276%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 79
+339%
18−20
−339%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 51
+292%
12−14
−292%
Valorant 130−140
+129%
55−60
−129%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 101
+274%
27−30
−274%
Palworld 40−45
+264%
10−12
−264%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+278%
9−10
−278%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 120−130
+254%
35−40
−254%
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30
+833%
3−4
−833%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+600%
3−4
−600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+343%
35−40
−343%
Valorant 150−160
+242%
45−50
−242%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 45−50
+1500%
3−4
−1500%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+400%
3−4
−400%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+375%
8−9
−375%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+282%
10−12
−282%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+317%
6−7
−317%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 35−40
+322%
9−10
−322%
Palworld 21−24
+283%
6−7
−283%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+367%
3−4
−367%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+93.8%
16−18
−93.8%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+333%
3−4
−333%
Palworld 12−14
+333%
3−4
−333%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 32
+3100%
1−2
−3100%
Valorant 85−90
+330%
20−22
−330%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 24−27
+2400%
1−2
−2400%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+367%
3−4
−367%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Dota 2 60−65
+300%
14−16
−300%
Far Cry 5 27
+800%
3−4
−800%
Forza Horizon 4 43
+617%
6−7
−617%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 22
+340%
5−6
−340%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 16−18
+240%
5−6
−240%
Palworld 12−14
+333%
3−4
−333%

This is how GTX 1070 Max-Q and PRO WX 2100 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1070 Max-Q is 292% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1070 Max-Q is 310% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 1070 Max-Q is 3100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, GTX 1070 Max-Q surpassed PRO WX 2100 in all 60 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 16.68 4.54
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 115 Watt 35 Watt

GTX 1070 Max-Q has a 267% higher aggregate performance score, and a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

PRO WX 2100, on the other hand, has a 14% more advanced lithography process, and 229% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon PRO WX 2100 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q is a notebook graphics card while Radeon PRO WX 2100 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 1070 Max-Q GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
vs
RX 470 Mobile Radeon RX 470 Mobile
PRO WX 2100 Radeon PRO WX 2100
vs
Tesla M2070 Tesla M2070
GTX 1070 Max-Q GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
vs
GTX 1650 Mobile GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
GTX 1080 Max-Q GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
vs
9500 GT GeForce 9500 GT
GTX 1080 Max-Q GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
vs
ATI Xbox 360 GPU Xbox 360 GPU
GTX 1080 Max-Q GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
vs
ATI V8750 FirePro V8750
GTX 1070 Max-Q GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
vs
Iris Graphics 6100 Iris Graphics 6100
GTX 1070 Max-Q GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
vs
6800 GT Dual GeForce 6800 GT Dual
GTX 1070 Max-Q GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
vs
Pro Vega 20 Radeon Pro Vega 20
GTX 1070 Max-Q GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
vs
T2000 Mobile Quadro T2000 Mobile
GTX 1070 Max-Q GTX 1070 Max-Q
vs
RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB
GTX 1070 Max-Q GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
vs
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server
Vega Frontier Edition Radeon Vega Frontier Edition
vs
ATI Mobility HD 5870 Crossfire Mobility Radeon HD 5870 Crossfire

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.1 96 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 61 votes

Rate Radeon PRO WX 2100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q or Radeon PRO WX 2100, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.