Tegra 4 GPU vs GeForce GTS 240 OEM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)VLIW Vec4 (2010−2013)
GPU code nameG92BTegra 4
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 July 2009 (17 years ago)1 August 2013 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores112no data
Core clock speed675 MHz672 MHz
Number of transistors754 million11 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt20 Watt
Texture fill rate37.802.688
Floating-point processing power0.3629 TFLOPSno data
ROPs164
TMUs564
L2 Cache64 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16IGP
Length229 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1100 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth70.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)N/A
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.3ES 3.0
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 July 2009 1 August 2013
Chip lithography 55 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 20 Watt

Tegra 4 GPU has an age advantage of 4 years, a 96% more advanced lithography process, and 500% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTS 240 OEM and Tegra 4 GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTS 240 OEM is a desktop graphics card while Tegra 4 GPU is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 43 votes

Rate GeForce GTS 240 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Tegra 4 GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTS 240 OEM or Tegra 4 GPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.