Tesla M2075 vs GeForce GTS 160M
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1007 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 2.10 | no data |
| Architecture | Tesla (2006−2010) | Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014) |
| GPU code name | G94 | GF110 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 3 March 2009 (17 years ago) | 25 July 2011 (15 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $2,399 |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 64 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 600 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 505 million | 3,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 60 Watt | 200 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 19.20 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.192 TFLOPS | 1.028 TFLOPS |
| Gigaflops | 288 | no data |
| ROPs | 16 | 48 |
| TMUs | 32 | 56 |
| L1 Cache | no data | 896 KB |
| L2 Cache | 64 KB | 768 KB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | no data |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 248 mm |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| SLI options | 2-way | - |
| MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | Up to 800 MHz | 783 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 51 GB/s | 150.3 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | VGADisplayPortDual Link DVIHDMILVDSSingle Link DVI | No outputs |
| HDMI | + | - |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | no data |
| Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | no data |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Power management | 8.0 | no data |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | + | 2.0 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 3 March 2009 | 25 July 2011 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 6 GB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 60 Watt | 200 Watt |
GTS 160M has 233% lower power consumption.
Tesla M2075, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 63% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between GeForce GTS 160M and Tesla M2075. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that GeForce GTS 160M is a notebook graphics card while Tesla M2075 is a workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
