GeForce FX 5700 vs GT 820M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 820M with GeForce FX 5700, including specs and performance data.

GT 820M
2013
1 GB DDR3, 15 Watt
1.27
+1170%

820M outperforms FX 5700 by a whopping 1170% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking10901533
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.550.31
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Rankine (2003−2005)
GPU code nameGF117NV36
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date27 November 2013 (12 years ago)23 October 2003 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96no data
Core clock speed775 MHz425 MHz
Number of transistors585 million82 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate12.401.700
Floating-point processing power0.2976 TFLOPSno data
ROPs84
TMUs164
L1 Cache128 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount1 GB128 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz250 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s16 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)9.0a
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.61.5 (2.1)
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.1-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GT 820M 1.27
+1170%
FX 5700 0.10

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GT 820M 530
+1225%
Samples: 244
FX 5700 40
Samples: 24

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.27 0.10
Recency 27 November 2013 23 October 2003
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 25 Watt

GT 820M has a 1170% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 364% more advanced lithography process, and 67% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GT 820M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce FX 5700 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GT 820M is a notebook graphics card while GeForce FX 5700 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 146 votes

Rate GeForce GT 820M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 77 votes

Rate GeForce FX 5700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 820M or GeForce FX 5700, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.