GMA X4500 vs GeForce GT 820M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1090not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.55no data
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Generation 5.0 (2008)
GPU code nameGF117Eaglelake
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date27 November 2013 (12 years ago)1 June 2008 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores9680
Core clock speed775 MHz533 MHz
Number of transistors585 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt13 Watt
Texture fill rate12.402.132
Floating-point processing power0.2976 TFLOPSno data
ROPs84
TMUs164
L1 Cache128 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed900 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)10.0
Shader Model5.14.0
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 27 November 2013 1 June 2008
Chip lithography 28 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 13 Watt

GT 820M has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 132% more advanced lithography process.

GMA X4500, on the other hand, has 15% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 820M and GMA X4500. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 820M is a notebook graphics card while GMA X4500 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 146 votes

Rate GeForce GT 820M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 373 votes

Rate GMA X4500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 820M or GMA X4500, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.