Iris Xe Graphics MAX vs GeForce GT 755M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GT 640M GT 640M Mac Edition GT 645M GT 650M GT 650M Mac Edition GT 730M GT 745M GT 750M GT 750M Mac Edition GT 755M GT 755M Mac Edition GTX 660M
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Iris Xe Graphics MAX 16EU 750 P750 Xe DG1 Xe DG1 OEM

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 755M with Iris Xe Graphics MAX, including specs and performance data.

GT 755M
2013
2 GB GDDR5, 50 Watt
4.15
Iris Xe Graphics MAX
2020
4 GB LPDDR4X, 25 Watt
4.31
+3.9%

Graphics MAX outperforms 755M by a minimal 4% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GT 755M GT 755M
Iris Xe Graphics MAX Iris Xe Graphics MAX

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking739726
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.4213.34
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code nameGK107DG1
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date25 June 2013 (13 years ago)31 October 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384768
Core clock speed980 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1650 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate31.3679.20
Floating-point processing power0.7526 TFLOPS2.534 TFLOPS
ROPs1624
TMUs3248
L1 Cache32 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x4
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5LPDDR4X
Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 GB
Standard memory configurationGDDR5no data
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1350 MHz4.3 GB/s
Memory bandwidth86.4 GB/s68.26 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
eDP 1.2 signal supportUp to 3840x2160no data
LVDS signal supportUp to 1920x1200no data
VGA аnalog display supportUp to 2048x1536no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) supportUp to 3840x2160no data
HDMI+-
HDCP content protection+-
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI+-
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu-Ray 3D Support+-
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+-
Optimus+-
3D Vision / 3DTV Play+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.13.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.2
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GT 755M 4.15
Iris Xe Graphics MAX 4.31
+3.9%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GT 755M 1727
Samples: 836
Iris Xe Graphics MAX 1797
+4.1%
Samples: 9

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p56
+1.8%
55−60
−1.8%
Full HD22
+4.8%
21−24
−4.8%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Palworld 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Fortnite 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%
Palworld 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 70−75
−1.4%
75−80
+1.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Dota 2 35−40
+5.7%
35−40
−5.7%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Fortnite 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Palworld 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Dota 2 35−40
+5.7%
35−40
−5.7%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Palworld 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35
+6.7%
30−33
−6.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+10%
30−33
−10%
Valorant 40−45
+2.5%
40−45
−2.5%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Palworld 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

This is how GT 755M and Iris Xe Graphics MAX compete in popular games:

  • GT 755M is 2% faster in 900p
  • GT 755M is 5% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 4.15 4.31
Recency 25 June 2013 31 October 2020
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 25 Watt

Iris Xe Graphics MAX has a 4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce GT 755M and Iris Xe Graphics MAX.

Be aware that GeForce GT 755M is a notebook graphics card while Iris Xe Graphics MAX is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GT 755M GeForce GT 755M
vs
Iris Plus Graphics 655 Iris Plus Graphics 655
Iris Xe Graphics MAX Iris Xe Graphics MAX
vs
Iris Plus Graphics Iris Plus Graphics
GT 755M GeForce GT 755M
vs
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
GT 755M GeForce GT 755M
vs
GeForce2 PRO GeForce2 PRO
GT 755M GeForce GT 755M
vs
RX 580 2048SP RX 580 2048SP
GT 755M GeForce GT 755M
vs
7050 + nForce 620i GeForce 7050 + nForce 620i
GT 755M GeForce GT 755M
vs
UHD Graphics G1 Graphics G1
GT 755M GeForce GT 755M
vs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
GT 755M GeForce GT 755M
vs
Apple M4 8-core GPU 8 core GPU
GTX 660M GeForce GTX 660M
vs
ATI Mobility HD 3650 Radeon HD 3650
GTX 660M GeForce GTX 660M
vs
R7 430 OEM R7 430 OEM
GTX 660M GeForce GTX 660M
vs
GT 730A GT 730A
GTX 660M GeForce GTX 660M
vs
GeForce 820A GeForce 820A

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.1 97 votes

Rate GeForce GT 755M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 254 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics MAX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 755M or Iris Xe Graphics MAX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.