UHD Graphics 750 vs GeForce GT 755M SLI
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce GT 755M SLI with UHD Graphics 750, including specs and performance data.
755M SLI outperforms Graphics 750 by an impressive 94% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 570 | 738 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 6.23 | 21.45 |
| Architecture | Kepler (2012−2018) | Generation 12.1 (2020−2021) |
| GPU code name | N14P-? | Rocket Lake GT1 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 1 November 2013 (12 years ago) | 30 March 2021 (5 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 768 | 256 |
| Core clock speed | 980 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1300 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 2x 1300 Million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 14 nm+++ |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 2x ~50 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 20.80 |
| Floating-point processing power | no data | 0.6656 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | no data | 8 |
| TMUs | no data | 16 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | no data |
| Interface | no data | Ring Bus |
| Width | no data | IGP |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2x 2 GB | System Shared |
| Memory bus width | 2x 128 Bit | System Shared |
| Memory clock speed | 5400 MHz | System Shared |
| Shared memory | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | No outputs |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11 | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | no data | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | no data | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | - | 1.2 |
| CUDA | + | - |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 36
+100%
| 18−20
−100%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 40−45
+133%
|
18−20
−133%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 16−18
+113%
|
8−9
−113%
|
| Palworld | 18−20
+90%
|
10−11
−90%
|
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 14−16
+150%
|
6−7
−150%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 35−40
+112%
|
16−18
−112%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 40−45
+133%
|
18−20
−133%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 16−18
+113%
|
8−9
−113%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 24−27
+117%
|
12−14
−117%
|
| Fortnite | 45−50
+104%
|
24−27
−104%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 35−40
+80%
|
20−22
−80%
|
| Palworld | 18−20
+90%
|
10−11
−90%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 27−30
+70.6%
|
16−18
−70.6%
|
| Valorant | 80−85
+49.1%
|
55−60
−49.1%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 35−40
+112%
|
16−18
−112%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 40−45
+133%
|
18−20
−133%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 120−130
+71.6%
|
70−75
−71.6%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 16−18
+113%
|
8−9
−113%
|
| Dota 2 | 60−65
+103%
|
30−33
−103%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 24−27
+117%
|
12−14
−117%
|
| Fortnite | 45−50
+104%
|
24−27
−104%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 35−40
+80%
|
20−22
−80%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 27−30
+123%
|
12−14
−123%
|
| Metro Exodus | 16−18
+100%
|
8−9
−100%
|
| Palworld | 18−20
+90%
|
10−11
−90%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 27−30
+70.6%
|
16−18
−70.6%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 21−24
+75%
|
12−14
−75%
|
| Valorant | 80−85
+49.1%
|
55−60
−49.1%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 35−40
+112%
|
16−18
−112%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 16−18
+113%
|
8−9
−113%
|
| Dota 2 | 60−65
+103%
|
30−33
−103%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 24−27
+117%
|
12−14
−117%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 35−40
+80%
|
20−22
−80%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 27−30
+70.6%
|
16−18
−70.6%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 21−24
+75%
|
12−14
−75%
|
| Valorant | 80−85
+49.1%
|
55−60
−49.1%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 45−50
+104%
|
24−27
−104%
|
| Palworld | 18−20
+90%
|
10−11
−90%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 14−16
+87.5%
|
8−9
−87.5%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 60−65
+93.8%
|
30−35
−93.8%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 10−11
+400%
|
2−3
−400%
|
| Metro Exodus | 8−9
+300%
|
2−3
−300%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 40−45
+33.3%
|
30−35
−33.3%
|
| Valorant | 80−85
+102%
|
40−45
−102%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 18−20
+1700%
|
1−2
−1700%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 6−7
+100%
|
3−4
−100%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 16−18
+143%
|
7−8
−143%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 18−20
+90%
|
10−11
−90%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 10−12
+83.3%
|
6−7
−83.3%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 16−18
+113%
|
8−9
−113%
|
| Palworld | 10−12
+83.3%
|
6−7
−83.3%
|
4K
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2
−100%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 18−20
+18.8%
|
16−18
−18.8%
|
| Metro Exodus | 3−4
+200%
|
1−2
−200%
|
| Palworld | 4−5
+100%
|
2−3
−100%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 8−9
+100%
|
4−5
−100%
|
| Valorant | 35−40
+94.4%
|
18−20
−94.4%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 9−10 | 0−1 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2
−100%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
+100%
|
1−2
−100%
|
| Dota 2 | 30−33
+114%
|
14−16
−114%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 8−9
+167%
|
3−4
−167%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 12−14
+160%
|
5−6
−160%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 8−9
+100%
|
4−5
−100%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 8−9
+100%
|
4−5
−100%
|
| Palworld | 4−5
+100%
|
2−3
−100%
|
This is how GT 755M SLI and UHD Graphics 750 compete in popular games:
- GT 755M SLI is 100% faster in 1080p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Battlefield 5, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GT 755M SLI is 1700% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Without exception, GT 755M SLI surpassed UHD Graphics 750 in all 55 of our tests.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 8.05 | 4.16 |
| Recency | 1 November 2013 | 30 March 2021 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 2 Watt | 15 Watt |
GT 755M SLI has a 94% higher aggregate performance score, and 650% lower power consumption.
UHD Graphics 750, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
The GeForce GT 755M SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 750 in performance tests.
Be aware that GeForce GT 755M SLI is a notebook graphics card while UHD Graphics 750 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
