GeForce G 110M vs GT 755M Mac Edition

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking948not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.10no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)G9x (2007−2010)
GPU code nameGK107N10M-GS1
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date8 November 2013 (12 years ago)8 January 2009 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38416
Core clock speed1085 MHz400 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt14 Watt
Texture fill rate34.72no data
Floating-point processing power0.8333 TFLOPSno data
ROPs16no data
TMUs32no data
L1 Cache32 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR2, GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz700 MHz
Memory bandwidth80 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)10
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.1.126-
CUDA3.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 November 2013 8 January 2009
Chip lithography 28 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 14 Watt

GT 755M Mac Edition has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 96% more advanced lithography process.

G 110M, on the other hand, has 257% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition and GeForce G 110M. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 11 votes

Rate GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 3 votes

Rate GeForce G 110M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition or GeForce G 110M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.