ATI FireGL V8600 vs GeForce GT 740A

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1000not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.99no data
ArchitectureKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameGK208R600
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date26 August 2013 (12 years ago)14 May 2007 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,899

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384320
Core clock speed980 MHz688 MHz
Number of transistors915 million720 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)33 Watt159 Watt
Texture fill rate31.3611.01
Floating-point processing power0.7526 TFLOPS0.4403 TFLOPS
ROPs816
TMUs3216
L1 Cache32 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 1.0 x16
Lengthno data254 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR4
Maximum RAM amount2 GB1 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit512 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz868 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s111.1 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)10.0 (10_0)
Shader Model5.14.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA3.5-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 26 August 2013 14 May 2007
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 80 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 33 Watt 159 Watt

GT 740A has an age advantage of 6 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 186% more advanced lithography process, and 382% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 740A and FireGL V8600. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 740A is a notebook graphics card while FireGL V8600 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 12 votes

Rate GeForce GT 740A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate FireGL V8600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 740A or FireGL V8600, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.