Radeon RX 6700 XT vs GeForce GT 730

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 730 and Radeon RX 6700 XT, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GT 730
2014, $60
2 GB DDR3, 49 Watt
1.96
RX 6700 XT
2021, $479
12 GB GDDR6, 230 Watt
47.12
+2304%

6700 XT outperforms GT 730 by a whopping 2304% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking95779
Place by popularity6368
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.1944.19
Power efficiency3.1215.96
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameGF108Navi 22
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date18 June 2014 (12 years ago)3 March 2021 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$59.99 $479

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

RX 6700 XT has 23158% better value for money than GT 730.

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores962560
Core clock speed700 MHz2321 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2581 MHz
Number of transistors585 million17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)49 Watt230 Watt
Texture fill rate11.2 GT/s413.0
Floating-point processing powerno data13.21 TFLOPS
ROPs464
TMUs16160
Ray Tracing Coresno data40
L0 Cacheno data640 KB
L1 Cache128 KB512 KB
L2 Cache256 KB3 MB
L3 Cacheno data96 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length145 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB12 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s384.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI 1.3a, 1x VGA1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI++

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.12.1
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA2.1-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GT 730 1.96
RX 6700 XT 47.12
+2304%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GT 730 821
Samples: 13278
RX 6700 XT 19715
+2301%
Samples: 14815

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GT 730 1170
RX 6700 XT 35136
+2903%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD5−6
−96.5%
143
1440p3−477
+2467%
4K1−245
+4400%

Cost per frame, $

1080p12.003.35
+72.1%
1440p20.006.22
+68.9%
4K59.9910.64
+82.3%
  • RX 6700 XT has 72% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RX 6700 XT has 69% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RX 6700 XT has 82% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 232 232
Counter-Strike 2 349 349
Cyberpunk 2077 119 119
Resident Evil 4 Remake 257 257

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 169 169
Battlefield 5 140−150 140−150
Counter-Strike 2 347 347
Cyberpunk 2077 99 99
Far Cry 5 178 178
Fortnite 200−210 200−210
Forza Horizon 4 180−190 180−190
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
Valorant 270−280 270−280

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 101 101
Battlefield 5 140−150 140−150
Counter-Strike 2 206 206
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280 270−280
Cyberpunk 2077 90 90
Dota 2 175 175
Far Cry 5 169 169
Fortnite 200−210 200−210
Forza Horizon 4 180−190 180−190
Grand Theft Auto V 161 161
Metro Exodus 119 119
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 223 223
Valorant 270−280 270−280

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 140−150 140−150
Cyberpunk 2077 85 85
Dota 2 139 139
Far Cry 5 159 159
Forza Horizon 4 180−190 180−190
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 127 127
Valorant 270−280 270−280

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 200−210 200−210

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 126 126
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 300−350 300−350
Grand Theft Auto V 102 102
Metro Exodus 71 71
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
Valorant 300−350 300−350

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 110−120 110−120
Cyberpunk 2077 56 56
Far Cry 5 137 137
Forza Horizon 4 140−150 140−150
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 100−105 100−105

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 130−140 130−140

4K
High

Atomic Heart 40−45 40−45
Counter-Strike 2 32 32
Grand Theft Auto V 102 102
Metro Exodus 43 43
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 74 74
Valorant 280−290 280−290

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 75−80 75−80
Counter-Strike 2 55−60 55−60
Cyberpunk 2077 25 25
Dota 2 106 106
Far Cry 5 71 71
Forza Horizon 4 95−100 95−100
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80 75−80

4K
Epic

Fortnite 65−70 65−70

This is how GT 730 and RX 6700 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 6700 XT is 2760% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6700 XT is 2467% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6700 XT is 4400% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 62 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.96 47.12
Recency 18 June 2014 3 March 2021
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 49 Watt 230 Watt

GT 730 has 79% lower power consumption.

RX 6700 XT, on the other hand, has a 2304% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 83% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6700 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 730 in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 7381 votes

Rate GeForce GT 730 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 8719 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6700 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 730 or Radeon RX 6700 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.