RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile vs GeForce GT 730

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 730 with RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile, including specs and performance data.

GT 730
2014, $60
2 GB DDR3, 49 Watt
1.97
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
2023
12 GB GDDR6, 110 Watt
52.73
+2577%

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms GT 730 by a whopping 2577% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking95564
Place by popularity51not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.19no data
Power efficiency3.1137.10
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGF108AD104
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date18 June 2014 (12 years ago)21 March 2023 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$59.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores967424
Core clock speed700 MHz1290 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1665 MHz
Number of transistors585 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)49 Watt110 Watt
Texture fill rate11.2 GT/s386.3
Floating-point processing powerno data24.72 TFLOPS
ROPs480
TMUs16232
Tensor Coresno data232
Ray Tracing Coresno data58
L1 Cache128 KB7.3 MB
L2 Cache256 KB48 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length145 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB12 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s432.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI 1.3a, 1x VGAPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA2.18.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GT 730 1.97
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile 52.73
+2577%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GT 730 821
Samples: 13189
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile 21966
+2576%
Samples: 470

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GT 730 1170
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile 40179
+3334%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.97 52.73
Recency 18 June 2014 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 49 Watt 110 Watt

GT 730 has 124% lower power consumption.

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile, on the other hand, has a 2577% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 730 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GT 730 is a desktop graphics card while RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 7379 votes

Rate GeForce GT 730 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 47 votes

Rate RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 730 or RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.