GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile vs GT 720

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
705 OEM 710 710 OEM 710 PCI 710 PCIe x1 720 720 OEM 730 730 OEM 740 740 OEM
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
4050 Max-Q 4050 Mobile 4060 Max-Q 4060 Mobile 4060 Ti Mobile 4070 Max-Q 4070 Mobile 4080 Max-Q 4080 Mobile 4080 Ti Max-Q 4080 Ti Mobile 4090 Max-Q 4090 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 720 with GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

GT 720
2014, $49
1 GB or 1 GB DDR3 / GDDR5, 19 Watt
1.59

RTX 4060 Mobile outperforms GT 720 by a whopping 2517% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GT 720 GT 720
RTX 4060 Mobile RTX 4060 Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1016112
Place by popularitynot in top-10066
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.02no data
Power efficiency6.4828.01
ArchitectureKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGK208BAD107
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date29 September 2014 (11 years ago)3 January 2023 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$49 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1923072
Core clock speed797 MHz1545 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1890 MHz
Number of transistors915 million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)19 Watt115 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature98 °Cno data
Texture fill rate12.75181.4
Floating-point processing power0.306 TFLOPS11.61 TFLOPS
ROPs848
TMUs1696
Tensor Coresno data96
Ray Tracing Coresno data24
L1 Cache16 KB3 MB
L2 Cache128 KB32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportPCI Express 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x8
Length145 mmno data
Height2.713" (6.9 cm)no data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3 / GDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB or 1 GB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1.8 GBps or 5.0 GB/s2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 (DDR3) or 40 (GDDR5)256.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsDual Link DVI-DHDMIVGAPortable Device Dependent
Multi monitor support3 displaysno data
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray+-
3D Gaming+-
3D Vision+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA+8.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GT 720 1.59
RTX 4060 Mobile 41.61
+2517%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GT 720 661
Samples: 1799
RTX 4060 Mobile 17335
+2523%
Samples: 23072

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GT 720 730
RTX 4060 Mobile 26530
+3534%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD4−5
−2700%
112
+2700%
1440p2−3
−2950%
61
+2950%
4K1−2
−3700%
38
+3700%

Cost per frame, $

1080p12.25no data
1440p24.50no data
4K49.00no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 151
+0%
151
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 195
+0%
195
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 123
+0%
123
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 122
+0%
122
+0%
Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 195
+0%
195
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 99
+0%
99
+0%
Far Cry 5 128
+0%
128
+0%
Fortnite 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 137
+0%
137
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Valorant 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 82
+0%
82
+0%
Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 146
+0%
146
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 84
+0%
84
+0%
Dota 2 164
+0%
164
+0%
Far Cry 5 129
+0%
129
+0%
Fortnite 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 125
+0%
125
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 141
+0%
141
+0%
Metro Exodus 25
+0%
25
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 191
+0%
191
+0%
Valorant 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 77
+0%
77
+0%
Dota 2 156
+0%
156
+0%
Far Cry 5 125
+0%
125
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 101
+0%
101
+0%
Valorant 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 98
+0%
98
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 290−300
+0%
290−300
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 85
+0%
85
+0%
Metro Exodus 59
+0%
59
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 280−290
+0%
280−290
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 49
+0%
49
+0%
Far Cry 5 98
+0%
98
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 76
+0%
76
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

4K
High

Atomic Heart 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 39
+0%
39
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 76
+0%
76
+0%
Metro Exodus 37
+0%
37
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55
+0%
55
+0%
Valorant 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 19
+0%
19
+0%
Dota 2 126
+0%
126
+0%
Far Cry 5 40
+0%
40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

This is how GT 720 and RTX 4060 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4060 Mobile is 2700% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4060 Mobile is 2950% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4060 Mobile is 3700% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 1.59 41.61
Recency 29 September 2014 3 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB or 1 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 19 Watt 115 Watt

GT 720 has 505% lower power consumption.

RTX 4060 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 2517% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 720 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GT 720 is a desktop graphics card while GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GT 720 GeForce GT 720
vs
GT 630 GeForce GT 630
RTX 4060 Mobile GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
vs
RTX 3070 Ti Mobile GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile
GT 720 GeForce GT 720
vs
8800 Ultra GeForce 8800 Ultra
GT 720 GT 720
vs
6600 LE 6600 LE
GT 720 GT 720
vs
GeForce 6600 6600
GT 720 GT 720
vs
RX 580 2048SP RX 580 2048SP
GT 720 GT 720
vs
Iris Pro Graphics P6300 Iris Pro Graphics P6300
GT 720 GT 720
vs
UHD Graphics 750 UHD Graphics 750
GT 720 GT 720
vs
RTX 5050 Mobile RTX 5050 Mobile
GTX 660 Rev. 2 GTX 660 Rev. 2
vs
Riva TNT Riva TNT
GTX 660 Rev. 2 GTX 660 Rev. 2
vs
Graphics 384SP Graphics 384SP
GTX 660 Rev. 2 GTX 660 Rev. 2
vs
R7 350 640SP R7 350 640SP
GTX 660 Rev. 2 GTX 660 Rev. 2
vs
H3C XG310 H3C XG310

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.9 553 votes

Rate GeForce GT 720 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 5052 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 720 or GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.