HD Graphics P4000 vs GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition with HD Graphics P4000, including specs and performance data.

GT 650M Mac Edition
2012
512 MB GDDR5, 45 Watt
1.43
+15.3%

650M Mac Edition outperforms HD Graphics P4000 by a moderate 15% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking10481101
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.462.13
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Generation 7.0 (2012−2013)
GPU code nameGK107Ivy Bridge GT2
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date12 July 2012 (14 years ago)14 May 2012 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384128
Core clock speed900 MHz650 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1250 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 million1,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm22 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate28.8020.00
Floating-point processing power0.6912 TFLOPS0.32 TFLOPS
ROPs161
TMUs3216
L1 Cache32 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount512 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1254 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth80.26 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.1 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.0
OpenGL4.64.0
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.1.80
CUDA3.0-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.43 1.24
Recency 12 July 2012 14 May 2012
Chip lithography 28 nm 22 nm

GT 650M Mac Edition has a 15% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 1 month.

HD Graphics P4000, on the other hand, has a 27% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics P4000 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition is a notebook graphics card while HD Graphics P4000 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 23 votes

Rate GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 121 votes

Rate HD Graphics P4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 650M Mac Edition or HD Graphics P4000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.