FirePro S7150 vs GeForce GT 645 OEM
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 535 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 0.26 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 4.67 |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014) | GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) |
| GPU code name | GF114 | Tonga |
| Market segment | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | 24 April 2012 (14 years ago) | 1 February 2016 (10 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $2,399 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 288 | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | 776 MHz | 920 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 1,950 million | 5,000 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 102 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 37.25 | 117.8 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.894 TFLOPS | 3.768 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 24 | 32 |
| TMUs | 48 | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 384 KB | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | 384 KB | 512 KB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 210 mm | 241 mm |
| Width | 2-slot | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 1x 6-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 957 MHz | 1250 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 91.87 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | No outputs |
| HDMI | + | - |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 2.1 | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 24 April 2012 | 1 February 2016 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 8 GB |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 102 Watt | 150 Watt |
GT 645 OEM has 47% lower power consumption.
FirePro S7150, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 43% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 645 OEM and FirePro S7150. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that GeForce GT 645 OEM is a desktop graphics card while FirePro S7150 is a workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
