RTX A2000 Max-Q vs GeForce GT 635M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1088not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.81no data
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameGF116GA107
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date22 March 2012 (14 years ago)12 April 2021 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresUp to 1442560
Core clock speedUp to 675 MHz682 MHz
Boost clock speed753 MHz1207 MHz
Number of transistors1,170 million8,700 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt95 Watt
Texture fill rate16.2096.56
Floating-point processing power0.3888 TFLOPS6.18 TFLOPS
ROPs1648
TMUs2480
Tensor Coresno data80
Ray Tracing Coresno data20
L1 Cache192 KB2.5 MB
L2 Cache256 KB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI Express 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 GB
Memory bus widthUp to 192bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1375 MHz
Memory bandwidthUp to 43.2 GB/s176.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolutionUp to 2048x1536no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray+-
Optimus+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA+8.6
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 March 2012 12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 95 Watt

GT 635M has 171% lower power consumption.

RTX A2000 Max-Q, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 400% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 635M and RTX A2000 Max-Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 635M is a notebook graphics card while RTX A2000 Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 514 votes

Rate GeForce GT 635M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 7 votes

Rate RTX A2000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 635M or RTX A2000 Max-Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.