GRID K500 vs GeForce GT 635M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1088not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.81no data
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameGF116GK104
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date22 March 2012 (14 years ago)2 July 2014 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$3,599

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresUp to 1441536 ×2
Core clock speedUp to 675 MHz745 MHz
Boost clock speed753 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,170 million3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate16.2095.36 ×2
Floating-point processing power0.3888 TFLOPS2.289 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs1632 ×2
TMUs24128 ×2
L1 Cache192 KB128 KB
L2 Cache256 KB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI Express 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 GB ×2
Memory bus widthUp to 192bit256 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed900 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidthUp to 43.2 GB/s160.0 GB/s ×2
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolutionUp to 2048x1536no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray+-
Optimus+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA+3.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 March 2012 2 July 2014
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 225 Watt

GT 635M has 543% lower power consumption.

GRID K500, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 43% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 635M and GRID K500. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 635M is a notebook graphics card while GRID K500 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 514 votes

Rate GeForce GT 635M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GRID K500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 635M or GRID K500, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.