P106-100 vs GeForce GT 520

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 520 with P106-100, including specs and performance data.

GT 520
2011, $59
1 GB (DDR3) DDR3, 29 Watt
0.78

P106-100 outperforms GT 520 by a whopping 1982% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1225369
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.01no data
Power efficiency2.0810.47
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameGF119GP106
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date13 April 2011 (15 years ago)19 June 2017 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$59 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores481280
Core clock speed810 MHz1506 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1709 MHz
Number of transistors292 million4,400 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)29 Watt120 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature102 °Cno data
Texture fill rate6.480136.7
Floating-point processing power0.1555 TFLOPS4.375 TFLOPS
ROPs448
TMUs880
L1 Cache64 KB480 KB
L2 Cache128 KB1536 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support16x PCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length145 mm250 mm
Height2.7" (6.9 cm)no data
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB (DDR3)6 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz (DDR3)2002 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s192.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsDual Link DVI-IHDMIVGA (optional)No outputs
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.24.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA+6.1

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GT 520 0.78
P106-100 16.24
+1982%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GT 520 326
Samples: 2289
P106-100 6764
+1975%
Samples: 177

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GT 520 1266
P106-100 35950
+2740%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.78 16.24
Recency 13 April 2011 19 June 2017
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB (DDR3) 6 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 29 Watt 120 Watt

GT 520 has 314% lower power consumption.

P106-100, on the other hand, has a 1982% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.

The P106-100 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 520 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GT 520 is a desktop graphics card while P106-100 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 866 votes

Rate GeForce GT 520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 415 votes

Rate P106-100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 520 or P106-100, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.