UHD Graphics P750 vs GeForce GT 415M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 415M with UHD Graphics P750, including specs and performance data.

GT 415M
2010
512 MB DDR3, 12 Watt
0.68

Graphics P750 outperforms 415M by a whopping 516% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1257740
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.4221.78
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code nameGF108Rocket Lake GT1
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date3 September 2010 (16 years ago)2021 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48256
Core clock speed500 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1300 MHz
Number of transistors585 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm14 nm+++
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate4.00083.20
Floating-point processing power0.096 TFLOPS0.6656 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs864
L1 Cache64 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16Ring Bus
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount512 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed800 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsMotherboard Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GT 415M 0.68
UHD Graphics P750 4.19
+516%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GT 415M 286
Samples: 22
UHD Graphics P750 1758
+515%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 6−7
+500%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6 30−33
+500%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 6−7
+500%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6 30−33
+500%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6 30−33
+500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9 45−50
+463%
Valorant 30−35 190−200
+513%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 20−22 120−130
+500%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 6−7
+500%
Dota 2 12−14 70−75
+483%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6 30−33
+500%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6 30−33
+500%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9 45−50
+463%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7 35−40
+483%
Valorant 30−35 190−200
+513%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 6−7
+500%
Dota 2 12−14 70−75
+483%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6 30−33
+500%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6 30−33
+500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9 45−50
+463%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7 35−40
+483%
Valorant 30−35 190−200
+513%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3 12−14
+500%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 3−4 18−20
+500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8 40−45
+471%
Valorant 1−2 6−7
+500%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 2−3 12−14
+500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2 6−7
+500%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 1−2 6−7
+500%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16 90−95
+500%
Valorant 6−7 35−40
+483%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3 12−14
+500%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3 12−14
+500%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.68 4.19
Chip lithography 40 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 15 Watt

GT 415M has 20% lower power consumption.

UHD Graphics P750, on the other hand, has a 516% higher aggregate performance score, and a 65% more advanced lithography process.

The UHD Graphics P750 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 415M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GT 415M is a notebook graphics card while UHD Graphics P750 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 30 votes

Rate GeForce GT 415M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.6 67 votes

Rate UHD Graphics P750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 415M or UHD Graphics P750, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.