CMP 30HX vs GeForce GT 330M Mac Edition

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated404
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data4.82
Power efficiencyno data9.05
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGT216TU116
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date26 April 2010 (16 years ago)25 February 2021 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores481408
Core clock speed500 MHz1530 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1785 MHz
Number of transistors486 million6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)23 Watt125 Watt
Texture fill rate8.000157.1
Floating-point processing power0.1056 TFLOPS5.027 TFLOPS
ROPs848
TMUs1688
L1 Cacheno data1.4 MB
L2 Cache64 KB1536 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 1.0 x4
Lengthno data229 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB6 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed790 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.28 GB/s336.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.16.8
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA1.27.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 26 April 2010 25 February 2021
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 6 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 23 Watt 125 Watt

GT 330M Mac Edition has 443% lower power consumption.

CMP 30HX, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 233% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 330M Mac Edition and CMP 30HX. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 330M Mac Edition is a notebook graphics card while CMP 30HX is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 7 votes

Rate GeForce GT 330M Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 55 votes

Rate CMP 30HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 330M Mac Edition or CMP 30HX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.