Quadro T2000 Mobile vs GeForce GT 240M LE

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated326
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data24.72
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameG96CTU117
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date15 January 2010 (16 years ago)27 May 2019 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores321024
Core clock speed600 MHz1575 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1785 MHz
Number of transistors314 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)23 Watt60 Watt
Texture fill rate9.600114.2
Floating-point processing power0.096 TFLOPS3.656 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs1664
L1 Cacheno data1 MB
L2 Cache32 KB1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount512 MB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/s128.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.06.5
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA1.17.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 January 2010 27 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 23 Watt 60 Watt

GT 240M LE has 161% lower power consumption.

T2000 Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 358% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 240M LE and Quadro T2000 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 240M LE is a notebook graphics card while Quadro T2000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 3 votes

Rate GeForce GT 240M LE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 514 votes

Rate Quadro T2000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 240M LE or Quadro T2000 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.