Tesla K40t vs GeForce GT 230
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1227 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.01 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 0.80 | no data |
| Architecture | Tesla (2006−2010) | Kepler (2012−2018) |
| GPU code name | G94B | GK110B |
| Market segment | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | 12 October 2009 (16 years ago) | 22 November 2013 (12 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $43.99 | $7,699 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 48 | 2880 |
| Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 745 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 876 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 505 million | 7,080 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 245 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 15.60 | 210.2 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.156 TFLOPS | 5.046 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 48 |
| TMUs | 24 | 240 |
| L1 Cache | no data | 240 KB |
| L2 Cache | 64 KB | 1536 KB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 267 mm |
| Width | 1-slot | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 12 GB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 1502 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 57.6 GB/s | 288.4 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 1.1 | 3.5 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 12 October 2009 | 22 November 2013 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 12 GB |
| Chip lithography | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 245 Watt |
GT 230 has 227% lower power consumption.
Tesla K40t, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 96% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 230 and Tesla K40t. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that GeForce GT 230 is a desktop graphics card while Tesla K40t is a workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
