GeForce G103M vs GT 230
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1228 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.01 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 0.80 | no data |
| Architecture | Tesla (2006−2010) | Tesla (2006−2010) |
| GPU code name | G94B | G98 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 12 October 2009 (16 years ago) | 1 September 2009 (16 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $43.99 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 48 | 8 |
| Core clock speed | 650 MHz | 640 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 505 million | 210 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 14 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 15.60 | 5.120 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.156 TFLOPS | 0.0256 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 4 |
| TMUs | 24 | 8 |
| L2 Cache | 64 KB | 16 KB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Width | 1-slot | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR2 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 512 MB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 57.6 GB/s | 8 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 12 October 2009 | 1 September 2009 |
| Chip lithography | 55 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 14 Watt |
GT 230 has an age advantage of 1 month, and a 18% more advanced lithography process.
GeForce G103M, on the other hand, has 436% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 230 and GeForce G103M. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that GeForce GT 230 is a desktop graphics card while GeForce G103M is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
