N1 16SM vs GeForce GT 1030
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 657 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | 47 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 2.31 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 14.83 | no data |
| Architecture | Pascal (2016−2021) | Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) |
| GPU code name | GP108 | GB20B |
| Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 17 May 2017 (9 years ago) | 1 June 2026 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $79 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 384 | 2048 |
| Core clock speed | 1228 MHz | 741 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1468 MHz | 2346 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 1,800 million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 30 Watt | no data |
| Texture fill rate | 35.23 | 300.3 |
| Floating-point processing power | 1.127 TFLOPS | 9.609 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 24 |
| TMUs | 24 | 128 |
| Tensor Cores | no data | 64 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 16 |
| L1 Cache | 144 KB | 2 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 50 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x4 | PCIe 5.0 x16 |
| Length | 145 mm | no data |
| Width | 1-slot | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | LPDDR5X |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 128 GB |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1502 MHz | 1067 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 48.06 GB/s | 273.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | no data |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI | 1x HDMI |
| HDMI | + | + |
| G-SYNC support | + | - |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| VR Ready | + | no data |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | N/A |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | N/A |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | N/A |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | 6.1 | 12.1 |
| DLSS | - | + |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 17 May 2017 | 1 June 2026 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 128 GB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 5 nm |
N1 16SM has an age advantage of 9 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 1030 and N1 16SM. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that GeForce GT 1030 is a desktop graphics card while N1 16SM is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
