Radeon RX Vega 3 vs GeForce G210 OEM Rev. 2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated860
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data14.23
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameGT218Picasso
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date24 August 2009 (17 years ago)20 November 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16192
Core clock speed589 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1100 MHz
Number of transistors260 million4,940 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)31 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate4.71213.20
Floating-point processing power0.04486 TFLOPS0.4224 TFLOPS
ROPs44
TMUs812
L2 Cache32 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16IGP
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2System Shared
Maximum RAM amount128 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed400 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGAMotherboard Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.16.7
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA1.2-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 24 August 2009 20 November 2019
Chip lithography 40 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 31 Watt 15 Watt

RX Vega 3 has an age advantage of 10 years, a 233% more advanced lithography process, and 107% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce G210 OEM Rev. 2 and Radeon RX Vega 3. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 7 votes

Rate GeForce G210 OEM Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 2289 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce G210 OEM Rev. 2 or Radeon RX Vega 3, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.