Tesla V100 DGXS vs GeForce G205M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1404not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.66no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Volta (2017−2020)
GPU code nameC79GV100
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date8 January 2009 (17 years ago)27 March 2018 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores165120
Core clock speed450 MHz1297 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1530 MHz
Number of transistors314 million21,100 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)14 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate3.600489.6
Floating-point processing power0.0352 TFLOPS15.67 TFLOPS
ROPs4128
TMUs8320
Tensor Coresno data640
L1 Cacheno data10 MB
L2 Cacheno data6 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedHBM2
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared32 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared4096 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared876 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data897.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.06.4
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA-7.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 January 2009 27 March 2018
Chip lithography 65 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 14 Watt 250 Watt

GeForce G205M has 1686% lower power consumption.

Tesla V100 DGXS, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, and a 442% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce G205M and Tesla V100 DGXS. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce G205M is a notebook graphics card while Tesla V100 DGXS is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 26 votes

Rate GeForce G205M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 13 votes

Rate Tesla V100 DGXS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce G205M or Tesla V100 DGXS, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.