Matrox G450 x4 MMS vs GeForce G205M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1408not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.66no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)G400 (1999−2002)
GPU code nameC79Condor
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date8 January 2009 (17 years ago)1 January 2001 (25 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16no data
Core clock speed450 MHz125 MHz
Number of transistors314 million10 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)14 Wattno data
Texture fill rate3.6000.25
Floating-point processing power0.0352 TFLOPSno data
ROPs42
TMUs82

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCI
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data1-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared32 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared332 MBps
Memory bandwidthno data2.656 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)6.0
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.3None
OpenCLN/ANone
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 January 2009 1 January 2001
Chip lithography 65 nm 180 nm

GeForce G205M has an age advantage of 8 years, and a 177% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce G205M and Matrox G450 x4 MMS. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce G205M is a notebook graphics card while Matrox G450 x4 MMS is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 26 votes

Rate GeForce G205M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.1 11 votes

Rate Matrox G450 x4 MMS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce G205M or Matrox G450 x4 MMS, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.