GeForce GT 330M Mac Edition vs G205M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1404not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.66no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameC79GT216
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date8 January 2009 (17 years ago)26 April 2010 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1648
Core clock speed450 MHz500 MHz
Number of transistors314 million486 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)14 Watt23 Watt
Texture fill rate3.6008.000
Floating-point processing power0.0352 TFLOPS0.1056 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs816
L2 Cacheno data64 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16MXM-A (3.0)

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared512 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared790 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data25.28 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model4.04.1
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 January 2009 26 April 2010
Chip lithography 65 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 14 Watt 23 Watt

GeForce G205M has 64% lower power consumption.

GT 330M Mac Edition, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 63% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce G205M and GeForce GT 330M Mac Edition. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 26 votes

Rate GeForce G205M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 7 votes

Rate GeForce GT 330M Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce G205M or GeForce GT 330M Mac Edition, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.