Arc A370M vs GeForce G103M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated451
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data27.14
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Xe-HPG (2022−2024)
GPU code nameG98DG2-128
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 September 2009 (16 years ago)30 March 2022 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores81024
Core clock speed640 MHz1550 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2050 MHz
Number of transistors210 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)14 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate5.120131.2
Floating-point processing power0.0256 TFLOPSno data
ROPs432
TMUs864
Ray Tracing Coresno data8
L1 Cacheno data1.5 MB
L2 Cache16 KB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth8 GB/s112.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.6
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.4
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 2009 30 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 14 Watt 35 Watt

GeForce G103M has 150% lower power consumption.

Arc A370M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 12 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 983% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce G103M and Arc A370M. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 36 votes

Rate GeForce G103M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 208 votes

Rate Arc A370M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce G103M or Arc A370M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.