Radeon R7 Graphics vs GeForce FX Go5300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1571not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRankine (2003−2005)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameNV34 A1Spectre
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 March 2003 (23 years ago)11 January 2014 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data512
Core clock speed275 MHz720 MHz
Boost clock speedno data836 MHz
Number of transistors45 million2,410 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data25 Watt
Texture fill rate1.10023.04
Floating-point processing powerno data0.7373 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs432

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xIGP
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount64 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed250 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth8 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsMotherboard Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0a12 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGL1.5 (2.1)4.6
OpenCLN/A2.1
VulkanN/A1.2.170

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 March 2003 11 January 2014
Chip lithography 150 nm 28 nm

R7 Graphics has an age advantage of 10 years, and a 436% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce FX Go5300 and Radeon R7 Graphics. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce FX Go5300 is a notebook graphics card while Radeon R7 Graphics is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate GeForce FX Go5300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 1851 votes

Rate Radeon R7 Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce FX Go5300 or Radeon R7 Graphics, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.