ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3450 vs GeForce FX 5950 Ultra

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1509not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.15no data
ArchitectureRankine (2003−2005)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameNV38M82
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date23 October 2003 (22 years ago)7 January 2008 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data40
Core clock speed475 MHz500 MHz
Number of transistors135 million181 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)74 Watt12 Watt
Texture fill rate3.8002.000
Floating-point processing powerno data0.04 TFLOPS
ROPs44
TMUs84
L2 Cacheno data64 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xMXM-II
Length229 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x Molexno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRDDR2
Maximum RAM amount256 MB256 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed475 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth30.4 GB/s6.4 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0a10.1
Shader Modelno data4.1
OpenGL2.13.3
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 October 2003 7 January 2008
Chip lithography 130 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 74 Watt 12 Watt

ATI Mobility HD 3450 has an age advantage of 4 years, a 136% more advanced lithography process, and 517% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce FX 5950 Ultra and Mobility Radeon HD 3450. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce FX 5950 Ultra is a desktop graphics card while Mobility Radeon HD 3450 is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 81 votes

Rate GeForce FX 5950 Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 9 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 3450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce FX 5950 Ultra or Mobility Radeon HD 3450, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.