Quadro K200M vs GeForce FX 5200 Ultra

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1574not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRankine (2003−2005)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameNV34 A2GK107
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date6 March 2003 (23 years ago)22 August 2014 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$149 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data192
Core clock speed325 MHz850 MHz
Number of transistors45 million1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data35 Watt
Texture fill rate1.30013.60
Floating-point processing powerno data0.3264 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs416
L1 Cacheno data16 KB
L2 Cacheno data128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xMXM-A (3.0)
Length171 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x Molexno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRDDR3
Maximum RAM amount128 MB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed325 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth10.4 GB/s12.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0a12 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGL1.5 (2.1)4.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA-3.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 March 2003 22 August 2014
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 1 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 28 nm

Quadro K200M has an age advantage of 11 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 436% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce FX 5200 Ultra and Quadro K200M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce FX 5200 Ultra is a desktop graphics card while Quadro K200M is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 7 votes

Rate GeForce FX 5200 Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro K200M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce FX 5200 Ultra or Quadro K200M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.