GeForce 9100M G mGPU vs FX 5200 Ultra

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1570not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRankine (2003−2005)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameNV34 A2C79
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date6 March 2003 (23 years ago)29 July 2008 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$149 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data8
Core clock speed325 MHz450 MHz
Number of transistors45 million314 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data12 Watt
Texture fill rate1.3003.600
Floating-point processing powerno data0.0176 TFLOPS
ROPs44
TMUs48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 2.0 x16
Length171 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x Molexno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount128 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed325 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth10.4 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0a11.1 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGL1.5 (2.1)3.3
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 March 2003 29 July 2008
Chip lithography 150 nm 65 nm

9100M G mGPU has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 131% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce FX 5200 Ultra and GeForce 9100M G mGPU Intel. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce FX 5200 Ultra is a desktop graphics card while GeForce 9100M G mGPU Intel is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 7 votes

Rate GeForce FX 5200 Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce 9100M G mGPU Intel on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce FX 5200 Ultra or GeForce 9100M G mGPU Intel, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.