A100X vs GeForce 9800M GTX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1144not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.03no data
Power efficiency1.12no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameG92GA100
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date15 July 2008 (18 years ago)28 June 2021 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$328.50 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1126912
CUDA cores per GPU112no data
Core clock speed500 MHz795 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1440 MHz
Number of transistors754 million54,200 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate28.00622.1
Floating-point processing power0.28 TFLOPS19.91 TFLOPS
Gigaflops420no data
ROPs16160
TMUs56432
Tensor Coresno data432
L1 Cacheno data20.3 MB
L2 Cache64 KB80 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3HBM2e
Maximum RAM amount1 GB80 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit5120 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1593 MHz
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s2,039 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)N/A
Shader Model4.0N/A
OpenGL3.3N/A
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+8.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 July 2008 28 June 2021
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 80 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 300 Watt

9800M GTX has 300% lower power consumption.

A100X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 12 years, a 7900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 829% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9800M GTX and A100X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9800M GTX is a notebook graphics card while A100X is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 3 votes

Rate GeForce 9800M GTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate A100X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9800M GTX or A100X, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.