GeForce 320M Mac Edition vs 9800M GTS SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking985not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.92no data
ArchitectureG9x (2007−2010)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameNB9E-GTC89
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date15 July 2008 (18 years ago)1 April 2010 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12848
Core clock speed600 MHz450 MHz
Number of transistors1508 Million486 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt23 Watt
Texture fill rateno data7.200
Floating-point processing powerno data0.0912 TFLOPS
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount512 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed800 MHzSystem Shared
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1011.1 (10_1)
Shader Modelno data4.1
OpenGLno data3.3
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 July 2008 1 April 2010
Chip lithography 55 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 23 Watt

320M Mac Edition has an age advantage of 1 year, a 38% more advanced lithography process, and 552% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9800M GTS SLI and GeForce 320M Mac Edition. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 8 votes

Rate GeForce 9800M GTS SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 7 votes

Rate GeForce 320M Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9800M GTS SLI or GeForce 320M Mac Edition, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.