UHD Graphics P630 vs GeForce 9800M GT SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
9800M GT 9800M GTS 9800M GT SLI 9800M GTS SLI 9800M GTX 9800M GTX SLI
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
HD Graphics 610 HD Graphics 620 HD Graphics 630 Iris Plus Graphics 640 Iris Plus Graphics 655 600 605 610 615 620 630 Mobile P630

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 9800M GT SLI and UHD Graphics P630, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

9800M GT SLI
2008
512 MB GDDR3, 130 Watt
1.88

Graphics P630 outperforms 9800M SLI by a whopping 215% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
9800M GT SLI 9800M GT SLI
UHD Graphics P630 UHD Graphics P630

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking965653
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.1230.53
ArchitectureG9x (2007−2010)Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameNB9E-GT2Coffee Lake GT2
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date15 July 2008 (18 years ago)24 May 2018 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192192
Core clock speed500 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1200 MHz
Number of transistors1508 Millionno data
Manufacturing process technology65 nm14 nm+++
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rateno data28.80
Floating-point processing powerno data0.4608 TFLOPS
ROPsno data3
TMUsno data24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataRing Bus
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount512 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed800 MHzSystem Shared
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1012 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−867%
27−30
+867%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−200%
12−14
+200%
Palworld 6−7
−133%
14−16
+133%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 5−6
−400%
24−27
+400%
Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−867%
27−30
+867%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−200%
12−14
+200%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−375%
18−20
+375%
Fortnite 8−9
−350%
35−40
+350%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−170%
27−30
+170%
Palworld 6−7
−133%
14−16
+133%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
−100%
21−24
+100%
Valorant 35−40
−78.9%
65−70
+78.9%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 5−6
−400%
24−27
+400%
Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−867%
27−30
+867%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 35−40
−154%
95−100
+154%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−200%
12−14
+200%
Dota 2 21−24
−133%
45−50
+133%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−375%
18−20
+375%
Fortnite 8−9
−350%
35−40
+350%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−170%
27−30
+170%
Grand Theft Auto V 3−4
−600%
21−24
+600%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−267%
10−12
+267%
Palworld 6−7
−133%
14−16
+133%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
−100%
21−24
+100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−100%
16−18
+100%
Valorant 35−40
−78.9%
65−70
+78.9%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 5−6
−400%
24−27
+400%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−200%
12−14
+200%
Dota 2 21−24
−133%
45−50
+133%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−375%
18−20
+375%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−170%
27−30
+170%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
−100%
21−24
+100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−100%
16−18
+100%
Valorant 35−40
−78.9%
65−70
+78.9%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 8−9
−350%
35−40
+350%
Palworld 6−7
−133%
14−16
+133%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
−175%
10−12
+175%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14
−254%
45−50
+254%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
−100%
35−40
+100%
Valorant 12−14
−369%
60−65
+369%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−450%
10−12
+450%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−167%
8−9
+167%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%
Palworld 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−13.3%
16−18
+13.3%
Valorant 10−11
−150%
24−27
+150%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 4−5
−425%
21−24
+425%
Far Cry 5 0−1 5−6
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 9−10
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%

1440p
High

Grand Theft Auto V 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

4K
High

Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
Palworld 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Epic

Palworld 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Resident Evil 4 Remake, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the UHD Graphics P630 is 900% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics P630 performs better in 52 tests (87%)
  • there's a draw in 8 tests (13%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 1.88 5.92
Recency 15 July 2008 24 May 2018
Chip lithography 65 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 15 Watt

UHD Graphics P630 has a 215% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 364% more advanced lithography process, and 767% lower power consumption.

The UHD Graphics P630 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9800M GT SLI in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

9800M GT SLI GeForce 9800M GT SLI
vs
Radeon 520 Radeon 520
UHD Graphics P630 UHD Graphics P630
vs
GTX 850M GeForce GTX 850M
9800M GT SLI GeForce 9800M GT SLI
vs
8800M GTX SLI GeForce 8800M GTX SLI
GTX 285M NVIDIA GTX 285M
vs
GT 620M 620M
GTX 285M NVIDIA GTX 285M
vs
FX 5700 5700
GTX 280M NVIDIA GTX 280M
vs
Radeon 660M 660M
GTX 280M NVIDIA 280M
vs
RTX 4070 AD103 4070 AD103
9800M GT SLI GeForce 9800M GT SLI
vs
P3200 Max-Q P3200 Max-Q
9800M GTS SLI GeForce 9800M GTS SLI
vs
ATI Mobility HD 530v 530v
9800M GTS SLI GeForce 9800M GTS SLI
vs
R7 Mobile Graphics Mobile Graphics
ATI Mobility HD 3870 X2 ATI Radeon HD 3870 X2
vs
FX 5700 EP 5700 EP
ATI Mobility HD 3870 X2 ATI Radeon HD 3870 X2
vs
RTX 4050 Mobile 4050 Mobile
8800M GTX SLI GeForce 8800M GTX SLI
vs
9400M GeForceBoost 9400M GeForceBoost

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce 9800M GT SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 56 votes

Rate UHD Graphics P630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9800M GT SLI or UHD Graphics P630, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.