Tesla K40m vs GeForce 9800 GT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 9800 GT with Tesla K40m, including specs and performance data.

9800 GT
2008, $160
1 GB GDDR3, 105 Watt
1.15
Tesla K40m
2013, $7,699
12 GB GDDR5, 245 Watt
7.54
+556%

K40m outperforms 9800 GT by a whopping 556% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1128586
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.060.06
Power efficiency0.712.38
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameG92GK110B
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date21 July 2008 (18 years ago)22 November 2013 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$160 $7,699

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

9800 GT and Tesla K40m have a nearly equal value for money.

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1122880
Core clock speed600 MHz745 MHz
Boost clock speedno data876 MHz
Number of transistors754 million7,080 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt245 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate33.60210.2
Floating-point processing power0.336 TFLOPS5.046 TFLOPS
ROPs1648
TMUs56240
L1 Cacheno data240 KB
L2 Cache64 KB1536 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length229 mm267 mm
Height1-slotno data
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB12 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1502 MHz
Memory bandwidth57.6 GB/s288.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsHDTVDual Link DVINo outputs
Multi monitor support+no data
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIS/PDIFno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model4.05.1
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA+3.5

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

9800 GT 1.15
Tesla K40m 7.54
+556%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

9800 GT 478
Samples: 3503
Tesla K40m 3143
+558%
Samples: 4

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.15 7.54
Recency 21 July 2008 22 November 2013
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 245 Watt

9800 GT has 133% lower power consumption.

Tesla K40m, on the other hand, has a 556% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 132% more advanced lithography process.

The Tesla K40m is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9800 GT in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 9800 GT is a desktop graphics card while Tesla K40m is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 1656 votes

Rate GeForce 9800 GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 21 votes

Rate Tesla K40m on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9800 GT or Tesla K40m, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.