FireStream 9250 vs GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated859
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data1.44
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameG92RV770
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date21 July 2008 (18 years ago)16 June 2008 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$160 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128800
Core clock speed725 MHz625 MHz
Number of transistors754 million956 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate46.4025.00
Floating-point processing power0.448 TFLOPS1 TFLOPS
ROPs1616
TMUs6440
L1 Cacheno data160 KB
L2 Cache64 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length229 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB1 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz993 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s63.55 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x DVI

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model4.04.1
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 July 2008 16 June 2008
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 1 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 150 Watt

9800 GT Rebrand has an age advantage of 1 month, and 20% lower power consumption.

FireStream 9250, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 18% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand and FireStream 9250. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand is a desktop graphics card while FireStream 9250 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 35 votes

Rate GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 6 votes

Rate FireStream 9250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand or FireStream 9250, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.