RTX A2000 Max-Q vs GeForce 9700M GTS
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1233 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 0.97 | no data |
| Architecture | Tesla (2006−2010) | Ampere (2020−2025) |
| GPU code name | G94 | GA107 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 29 July 2008 (18 years ago) | 12 April 2021 (5 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 48 | 2560 |
| Core clock speed | 530 MHz | 682 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1207 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 505 million | 8,700 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 8 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 60 Watt | 95 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 12.72 | 96.56 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.1272 TFLOPS | 6.18 TFLOPS |
| Gigaflops | 180 | no data |
| ROPs | 16 | 48 |
| TMUs | 24 | 80 |
| Tensor Cores | no data | 80 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 20 |
| L1 Cache | no data | 2.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 64 KB | 2 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 4 GB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 1375 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | 176.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | Portable Device Dependent |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.8 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.3 |
| CUDA | + | 8.6 |
| DLSS | - | + |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 29 July 2008 | 12 April 2021 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 4 GB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 8 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 60 Watt | 95 Watt |
9700M GTS has 58% lower power consumption.
RTX A2000 Max-Q, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 12 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 713% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between GeForce 9700M GTS and RTX A2000 Max-Q. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that GeForce 9700M GTS is a notebook graphics card while RTX A2000 Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
