GeForce MX570 vs 9700M GT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
9100M G 9100M G mGPU AMD 9100M G mGPU Intel 9200M 9200M GS 9200M GS GDDR3 9300M G 9300M GS 9300M GS DDR2 9300M GS GDDR3 9400M 9400M (G) / ION (LE) 9400M G 9400M GeForceBoost 9500M G 9500M GE 9500M GS 9600M GS 9600M GT 9600M GT Mac Edition 9650M GS 9650M GT 9700M GT 9700M GTS 9800M GS 9800M GT 9800M GTS 9800M GT SLI 9800M GTS SLI 9800M GTX 9800M GTX SLI 9800S
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
MX570 MX570 A RTX 2050 Max-Q RTX 2050 Mobile RTX 3050 Max-Q RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 4 GB RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 6 GB RTX 3050 Mobile RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh 4 GB RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh 6 GB RTX 3050 Ti Max-Q

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 9700M GT and GeForce MX570, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

9700M GT
2008
512 MB GDDR3, 45 Watt
0.78

MX570 outperforms 9700M by a whopping 1659% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
9700M GT 9700M GT
GeForce MX570 GeForce MX570

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1224420
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.3442.45
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameG96GA107
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date29 July 2008 (18 years ago)May 2022 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores322048
Core clock speed625 MHz832 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1155 MHz
Number of transistors314 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology65 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate10.0073.92
Floating-point processing power0.0992 TFLOPS4.731 TFLOPS
Gigaflops148no data
ROPs840
TMUs1664
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data16
L1 Cacheno data2 MB
L2 Cache32 KB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXM-IIPCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s96 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.6
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA+8.6
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

9700M GT 0.78
GeForce MX570 13.72
+1659%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

9700M GT 327
Samples: 65
GeForce MX570 5717
+1648%
Samples: 50

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD2−3
−1800%
38
+1800%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2800%
27−30
+2800%
Palworld 4−5
−700%
30−35
+700%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2800%
27−30
+2800%
Far Cry 5 0−1 45−50
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−1060%
55−60
+1060%
Palworld 4−5
−700%
30−35
+700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−538%
50−55
+538%
Valorant 27−30
−303%
110−120
+303%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 21−24
−800%
180−190
+800%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2800%
27−30
+2800%
Dota 2 12−14
−592%
90−95
+592%
Far Cry 5 0−1 45−50
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−1060%
55−60
+1060%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−2800%
27−30
+2800%
Palworld 4−5
−700%
30−35
+700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−538%
50−55
+538%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−517%
35−40
+517%
Valorant 27−30
−303%
110−120
+303%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2800%
27−30
+2800%
Dota 2 12−14
−592%
90−95
+592%
Far Cry 5 0−1 45−50
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−1060%
55−60
+1060%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−538%
50−55
+538%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−467%
34
+467%
Valorant 27−30
−303%
110−120
+303%

Full HD
Epic

Palworld 4−5
−700%
30−35
+700%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−800%
27−30
+800%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 4−5
−2475%
100−110
+2475%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−1275%
110−120
+1275%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−1600%
30−35
+1600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−900%
20−22
+900%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
−3000%
30−35
+3000%
Palworld 1−2
−1800%
18−20
+1800%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−73.3%
24−27
+73.3%
Valorant 6−7
−1017%
65−70
+1017%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−550%
12−14
+550%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−600%
14−16
+600%

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 122
+0%
122
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 106
+0%
106
+0%
Fortnite 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 40
+0%
40
+0%
Fortnite 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 54
+0%
54
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

1440p
High

Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Far Cry 5 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Palworld 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Dota 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

4K
Epic

Palworld 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

This is how 9700M GT and GeForce MX570 compete in popular games:

  • GeForce MX570 is 1800% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Fortnite, with 1440p resolution and the Epic Preset, the GeForce MX570 is 3000% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GeForce MX570 performs better in 34 tests (55%)
  • there's a draw in 28 tests (45%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.78 13.72
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 25 Watt

GeForce MX570 has a 1659% higher aggregate performance score, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 713% more advanced lithography process, and 80% lower power consumption.

The GeForce MX570 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9700M GT in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

9700M GT GeForce 9700M GT
vs
R3 (Mullins/Beema) Radeon R3 (Mullins/Beema)
GeForce MX570 GeForce MX570
vs
GTX 970M GeForce GTX 970M
9700M GT GeForce 9700M GT
vs
8700M GT SLI GeForce 8700M GT SLI
9700M GT 9700M GT
vs
9500 GT 9500 GT
9700M GT 9700M GT
vs
ATI Mobility 9700 SE Mobility 9700 SE
9700M GT 9700M GT
vs
RTX 2080 RTX 2080
9700M GT 9700M GT
vs
R9 M290X Mac Edition R9 M290X Mac Edition
9700M GT 9700M GT
vs
Pro W6800X Pro W6800X
9700M GT 9700M GT
vs
Arc A370M Arc A370M
9700M GT 9700M GT
vs
Radeon 760M 760M
9700M GT 9700M GT
vs
UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)
GT 230M GT 230M
vs
GeForce 310M 310M
GT 230M GT 230M
vs
ION 2 ION 2

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.6 9 votes

Rate GeForce 9700M GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 129 votes

Rate GeForce MX570 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9700M GT or GeForce MX570, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.