GeForce GTX 1630 vs 9700M GT
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce 9700M GT with GeForce GTX 1630, including specs and performance data.
GTX 1630 outperforms 9700M by a whopping 1432% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1227 | 459 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 1.34 | 12.33 |
| Architecture | Tesla (2006−2010) | Turing (2018−2022) |
| GPU code name | G96 | TU117 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 29 July 2008 (18 years ago) | 28 June 2022 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 32 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 1740 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1785 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 314 million | 4,700 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 10.00 | 57.12 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.0992 TFLOPS | 1.828 TFLOPS |
| Gigaflops | 148 | no data |
| ROPs | 8 | 16 |
| TMUs | 16 | 32 |
| L1 Cache | no data | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | 32 KB | 1024 KB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | medium sized | no data |
| Interface | MXM-II | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 145 mm |
| Width | no data | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 4 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | 96 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a |
| HDMI | - | + |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.8 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.3 |
| CUDA | + | 7.5 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Atomic Heart | 2−3
−1400%
|
30−33
+1400%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−1300%
|
14−16
+1300%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Atomic Heart | 2−3
−1400%
|
30−33
+1400%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−1300%
|
14−16
+1300%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6
−1400%
|
75−80
+1400%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 8−9
−1400%
|
120−130
+1400%
|
| Valorant | 30−35
−1352%
|
450−500
+1352%
|
Full HD
High
| Atomic Heart | 2−3
−1400%
|
30−33
+1400%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 21−24
−1329%
|
300−310
+1329%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−1300%
|
14−16
+1300%
|
| Dota 2 | 12−14
−1362%
|
190−200
+1362%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6
−1400%
|
75−80
+1400%
|
| Metro Exodus | 1−2
−1300%
|
14−16
+1300%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 8−9
−1400%
|
120−130
+1400%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 6−7
−1400%
|
90−95
+1400%
|
| Valorant | 30−35
−1352%
|
450−500
+1352%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−1300%
|
14−16
+1300%
|
| Dota 2 | 12−14
−1362%
|
190−200
+1362%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6
−1400%
|
75−80
+1400%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 8−9
−1400%
|
120−130
+1400%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 6−7
−1400%
|
90−95
+1400%
|
| Valorant | 30−35
−1352%
|
450−500
+1352%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 3−4
−1400%
|
45−50
+1400%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 4−5
−1400%
|
60−65
+1400%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 8−9
−1400%
|
120−130
+1400%
|
| Valorant | 2−3
−1400%
|
30−33
+1400%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
−1400%
|
30−33
+1400%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1−2
−1300%
|
14−16
+1300%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 1−2
−1300%
|
14−16
+1300%
|
4K
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
−1367%
|
220−230
+1367%
|
| Valorant | 6−7
−1400%
|
90−95
+1400%
|
4K
Ultra
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 2−3
−1400%
|
30−33
+1400%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 2−3
−1400%
|
30−33
+1400%
|
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.78 | 11.95 |
| Recency | 29 July 2008 | 28 June 2022 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 4 GB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 75 Watt |
9700M GT has 67% lower power consumption.
GTX 1630, on the other hand, has a 1432% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 442% more advanced lithography process.
The GeForce GTX 1630 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9700M GT in performance tests.
Be aware that GeForce 9700M GT is a notebook graphics card while GeForce GTX 1630 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
