Quadro FX 370 LP vs GeForce 9600M GT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 9600M GT with Quadro FX 370 LP, including specs and performance data.

9600M GT
2008
512 MB GDDR3, 23 Watt
0.42
+61.5%

9600M outperforms 370 LP by an impressive 62% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking13411442
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.410.81
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameG96CG98
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date4 June 2008 (18 years ago)6 November 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$129

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores328
Core clock speed120 MHz540 MHz
Number of transistors314 million210 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)23 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate8.0004.320
Floating-point processing power0.08 TFLOPS0.01728 TFLOPS
ROPs84
TMUs168
L2 Cache32 KB16 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXM-IIPCIe 1.0 x16
Lengthno data198 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR2
Maximum RAM amount512 MB256 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz500 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s8 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DMS-59

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model4.04.0
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+1.1

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

9600M GT 0.42
+61.5%
FX 370 LP 0.26

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

9600M GT 173
+60.2%
Samples: 982
FX 370 LP 108
Samples: 2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Valorant 27−30
+81.3%
16−18
−81.3%

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 1−2 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
+66.7%
9−10
−66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Valorant 27−30
+81.3%
16−18
−81.3%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Valorant 27−30
+81.3%
16−18
−81.3%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 1−2 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2 0−1

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 0−1 0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+66.7%
9−10
−66.7%
Valorant 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2 0−1

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.42 0.26
Recency 4 June 2008 6 November 2008
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 256 MB
Chip lithography 55 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 23 Watt 25 Watt

9600M GT has a 62% higher aggregate performance score, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 18% more advanced lithography process, and 9% lower power consumption.

FX 370 LP, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 months.

The GeForce 9600M GT is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 370 LP in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 9600M GT is a notebook graphics card while Quadro FX 370 LP is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 110 votes

Rate GeForce 9600M GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 4 votes

Rate Quadro FX 370 LP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9600M GT or Quadro FX 370 LP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.