Radeon RX 8800 XT vs GeForce 9600 GT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1140not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.05no data
Power efficiency0.92no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)RDNA 4.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameG94Navi 48
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date21 February 2008 (18 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$179 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores644096
Core clock speed650 MHz1295 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2430 MHz
Number of transistors505 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology65 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)96 Watt220 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate20.80622.1
Floating-point processing power0.208 TFLOPS19.91 TFLOPS
ROPs1696
TMUs32256
Ray Tracing Coresno data64
L0 Cacheno data1 MB
L1 Cacheno data768 KB
L2 Cache64 KB4 MB
L3 Cacheno data64 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support16x PCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length229 mm267 mm
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin2x 8-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz2438 MHz
Memory bandwidth57.6 GB/s624.1 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsHDTVTwo Dual Link DVI1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI-+
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIS/PDIFno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.8
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCL1.12.2
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 16 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 96 Watt 220 Watt

9600 GT has 56% lower power consumption.

RX 8800 XT, on the other hand, has a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 94% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9600 GT and Radeon RX 8800 XT. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 2222 votes

Rate GeForce 9600 GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 149 votes

Rate Radeon RX 8800 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9600 GT or Radeon RX 8800 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.