ATI FireGL V7200 vs GeForce 9600 GSO 512

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1222not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.68no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Ultra-Threaded SE (2005−2007)
GPU code nameG94R520
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date23 October 2008 (17 years ago)1 October 2005 (20 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,279

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48no data
Core clock speed650 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistors505 million312 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)90 Wattno data
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate15.609.600
Floating-point processing power0.156 TFLOPSno data
ROPs1616
TMUs2416
L2 Cache64 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length229 mm229 mm
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 6-pin
SLI options2-way-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB256 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz650 MHz
Memory bandwidth57.6 GB/s41.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsTwo Dual Link DVIHDTV2x DVI, 1x S-Video
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIS/PDIFno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model4.03.0
OpenGL2.12.1
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 October 2008 1 October 2005
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 256 MB
Chip lithography 65 nm 90 nm

9600 GSO 512 has an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 38% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9600 GSO 512 and FireGL V7200. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9600 GSO 512 is a desktop graphics card while FireGL V7200 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 65 votes

Rate GeForce 9600 GSO 512 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 2 votes

Rate FireGL V7200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9600 GSO 512 or FireGL V7200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.