ATI FireMV 2200 vs GeForce 9500M GE

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Architectureno dataR300 (2003−2008)
GPU code nameMCP79Mx + NB9MRV370
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date9 January 2008 (18 years ago)2006 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores24no data
Core clock speedno data324 MHz
Number of transistorsno data107 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm110 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rateno data1.296
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 1.0 x16
Lengthno data170 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR2, GDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount256 MB128 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speedno data392 MBps
Memory bandwidthno data3.136 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DMS-59

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.09.0
OpenGLno data2.0
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 128 MB
Chip lithography 65 nm 110 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 15 Watt

9500M GE has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 69% more advanced lithography process.

ATI FireMV 2200, on the other hand, has 67% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9500M GE and FireMV 2200. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9500M GE is a notebook graphics card while FireMV 2200 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce 9500M GE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 6 votes

Rate FireMV 2200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9500M GE or FireMV 2200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.