Tesla M2050 vs GeForce 9500 GS

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1302not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.01no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameG96GF100
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date29 July 2008 (18 years ago)25 July 2011 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,699

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32448
Core clock speed550 MHz575 MHz
Number of transistors314 million3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate8.80032.20
Floating-point processing power0.088 TFLOPS1.03 TFLOPS
ROPs848
TMUs1656
L1 Cacheno data896 KB
L2 Cache32 KB768 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data248 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount512 MB3 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed504 MHz773 MHz
Memory bandwidth16.13 GB/s148.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model4.05.1
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.12.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 July 2008 25 July 2011
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 3 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 225 Watt

9500 GS has 463% lower power consumption.

Tesla M2050, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 63% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9500 GS and Tesla M2050. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9500 GS is a desktop graphics card while Tesla M2050 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 32 votes

Rate GeForce 9500 GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 3 votes

Rate Tesla M2050 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9500 GS or Tesla M2050, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.