Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile vs GeForce 9500 GS

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
9500 GS 9500 GS Rev. 2 9500 GT 9500 GT Mac Edition 9500 GT Rev. 2 9500 GT Rev. 3
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
3000 Mobile 3000 Max-Q 3000 Mobile Refresh 3000 X2 Mobile 4000 Mobile 4000 Max-Q 5000 Mobile 5000 Max-Q 5000 Mobile Refresh 5000 X2 Mobile 6000 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 9500 GS with Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

9500 GS
2008
512 MB DDR2, 40 Watt
0.52

RTX 3000 Mobile outperforms 9500 GS by a whopping 4569% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
9500 GS 9500 GS
RTX 3000 Mobile RTX 3000 Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1305263
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.0123.48
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameG96TU106
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date29 July 2008 (18 years ago)27 May 2019 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores322304
Core clock speed550 MHz945 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1380 MHz
Number of transistors314 million10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate8.800198.7
Floating-point processing power0.088 TFLOPS6.359 TFLOPS
ROPs864
TMUs16144
Tensor Coresno data288
Ray Tracing Coresno data36
L1 Cacheno data2.3 MB
L2 Cache32 KB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB6 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed504 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth16.13 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model4.06.5
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA1.17.5
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

9500 GS 0.52
RTX 3000 Mobile 24.28
+4569%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

9500 GS 215
Samples: 222
RTX 3000 Mobile 10116
+4605%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD2−3
−4650%
95
+4650%
4K1−2
−8700%
88
+8700%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Battlefield 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Fortnite 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Valorant 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Battlefield 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Dota 2 132
+0%
132
+0%
Far Cry 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Fortnite 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Metro Exodus 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 109
+0%
109
+0%
Valorant 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Dota 2 121
+0%
121
+0%
Far Cry 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 56
+0%
56
+0%
Valorant 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

4K
High

Atomic Heart 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Dota 2 88
+0%
88
+0%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

This is how 9500 GS and RTX 3000 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3000 Mobile is 4650% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3000 Mobile is 8700% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.52 24.28
Recency 29 July 2008 27 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 6 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 80 Watt

9500 GS has 100% lower power consumption.

RTX 3000 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 4569% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 442% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9500 GS in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 9500 GS is a desktop graphics card while Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

9500 GS GeForce 9500 GS
vs
ATI HD 2600 PRO Radeon HD 2600 PRO
RTX 3000 Mobile Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile
vs
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
9500 GS GeForce 9500 GS
vs
GT 220 GeForce GT 220
RTX 4000 Quadro RTX 4000
vs
RX 9070 GRE Radeon RX 9070 GRE
RTX 4000 Quadro RTX 4000
vs
AI PRO R9700 Radeon AI PRO R9700
RTX 4000 Quadro RTX 4000
vs
RTX PRO 6000D Blackwell Max-Q RTX PRO 6000D Blackwell Max-Q
GTX 460 v2 ES GeForce GTX 460 v2 ES
vs
Xbox Series S GPU Xbox Series S GPU
9500 GS GeForce 9500 GS
vs
ATI X800 XT Radeon X800 XT
9500 GS GeForce 9500 GS
vs
RTX A2000 Mobile 8 GB RTX A2000 Mobile 8 GB
9500 GS Rev. 2 GeForce 9500 GS Rev. 2
vs
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)
Volari 8300
vs
Radeon 660M Radeon 660M
Volari 8300
vs
RTX 5070 Ti Mobile GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile
RX 590 GME RX 590 GME
vs
RX 560 XT RX 560 XT

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.4 32 votes

Rate GeForce 9500 GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 456 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9500 GS or Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.