Rubin Ultra GPU vs GeForce 940MX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking786not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency12.20no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Rubin Ultra (2027)
GPU code nameGM107GR110
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date28 June 2016 (10 years ago)2027

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51257344
Core clock speed795 MHz700 MHz
Boost clock speed861 MHz2267 MHz
Number of transistors1,870 million670,000 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)23 Watt3600 Watt
Texture fill rate27.554,062.5
Floating-point processing power0.8817 TFLOPS260 TFLOPS
ROPs824
TMUs321792
Tensor Coresno data1792
L1 Cache256 KB112 MB
L2 Cache1024 KB128 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 6.0 x16
Widthno dataSXM Module
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3, GDDR5HBM4e
Maximum RAM amount4 GB1024 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit32768 Bit
Memory clock speed1253 MHz1900 MHz
Memory bandwidth40.1 GB/s31.1 TB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost2.0no data
Optimus+-
GameWorks+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)N/A
Shader Model5.1N/A
OpenGL4.5N/A
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA+10.7
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 1024 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 23 Watt 3600 Watt

GeForce 940MX has 99% lower power consumption.

Rubin Ultra GPU, on the other hand, has a 25500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 89% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 940MX and Rubin Ultra GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 940MX is a notebook graphics card while Rubin Ultra GPU is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 2535 votes

Rate GeForce 940MX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 10 votes

Rate Rubin Ultra GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 940MX or Rubin Ultra GPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.