Tegra X2 vs GeForce 940A

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking867not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.26no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameGM108GP10B
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date13 March 2015 (11 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384256
Core clock speed1029 MHz854 MHz
Boost clock speed1124 MHz1465 MHz
Manufacturing process technology28 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)33 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate17.9823.44
Floating-point processing power0.8632 TFLOPS0.7501 TFLOPS
ROPs816
TMUs1616
L1 Cache192 KBno data
L2 Cache1024 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8IGP
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1001 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth16.02 GB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.1.126-
CUDA5.0-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 28 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 33 Watt 15 Watt

Tegra X2 has a 75% more advanced lithography process, and 120% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 940A and Tegra X2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 940A is a notebook graphics card while Tegra X2 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 5 votes

Rate GeForce 940A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 36 votes

Rate Tegra X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 940A or Tegra X2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.